Riddah dalam Perspektif Bahasa, Al-Qur’an dan Hadis (Studi Tentang Konsekuensi Hukum Riddah)

  • Roro Fatikhin Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Lampung
Keywords: Death, Apostasy, Consequence

Abstract

In Islamic studies, apostasy is still a matter that is also much discussed and the issue is always warm to be discussed time by time. so the conversation can always be interesting every time. The problem of riddah is basically a matter of belief and one's faith in a religion that he professes. The interesting one from this, that many Islamic Ulama give death punishment to the agent of riddah, but other Islamic Ulamarefuse that panishment, because Islam does not impose coercion on one's religion.This article is Library Research and tries to understand the consequences of the existing riddah law of the Qur'an and hadith. from this research can be concluded several things. the process of occurrence of  riddah has occurred since a long time, and still happen time to time until now. There are two opinions relating to the consequences of the perpetrators of this riddah. first he was condemned to be death and second, he was not condemned to death. but when we see on the existing reality, it can be seen that the second opinion is that prevailed until now because that opinion matches in ths era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Ansârî, Zakariyâ, Fath al-Wahhâb, juz II. Bayrût: Dâr al-Fikr, t.th.

Al-Rahmân al-Juzayrî. 2000. ‘Abd, al-Fiqh `alâ al-Madhâhib al-Arba`ah, al-Qâhirah: al-Maktab al-Thaqafî, juz IV.

Al-Dimyatî, Shata, I`ânah al-Tâlibîn, juz IV. Semarang: Thaha: Putera, t.th.

Ali, Atabik, Ahmad Zuhdi Muhdlor. 1996. Al-‘Ashri ‘Araby-Indonisy. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Ali Maksum Pondok Pesantren Krapyak.

Al-Qadir al-‘Audah. 1963. Abd, Al-Tasyri al-Jinai al-Islami, Jilid I, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub.

al-Qardhawi, Yusuf, Jarimah al-Riddah, wa ‘Uqubah al-Murtad, terj. Irfan Salim dan Abdul Hayyie al-Kattani. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Anis, Ibrahim. 1960. Al-Mu’jam al-Wasit. Mesir: Syarikah Musahamal.

A.P. Kau, Sofyan. 2013. Tafsir Hukum Tema-Tema Kontroversial. Yogyakarta: Mitra Pustaka.

Assagaf, Ja‘far, Kontekstualisasi hukum murtad dalam perspektif sejarah sosial hadis, Ijtihad, Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan, Volume 14, No. 1, Juni 2014.

Dudung Abdur Rahman. 2003. Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Kurnia Kalam Semesta.

Fuadi Abdullah, M. Robith. Meninjau Hukuman Mati Bagi Murtad: Kajian Hadist Tematik, de Jure, Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, Volume 4 Nomor 1, Juli 2012.

Husen Muslim bin Hajjaj. 1987. Abi, Mukhtashor Shohih Muslim. Beirut: Al-Maktab Al-Islamy.

Ishâq al-Shayrâzî, Abû, al-Muhadhdhab fî Fiqh al-Imâm al-Shâfi`î, juz II, Semarang: Thaha Putera, t.th.

Jabir al-‘Alwani. 2003. Thaha, Laa Ikhraja Fi ad-din, Kairo: Maktabah al-Syuruq ad-Dauliyah.

Karim Soroush, Abdul. 2002. Menggugat otoritas dan Tradisi Agama, Bandung: Mizan.

Maktabah Syamilah, Kitab Shohih Bukhori, Juz 6,

Moqsith. 2013. Abd, Tafsir Atas Hukum Murtad Dalam Islam, Jurnal Ahkam: Vol. XIII, No. 2, Juli.

Muchtar, Asmadi. 2015. Fatwa-Fatwa Imam syafi’i Masalah Ibadah, Jakarta: Amzah.

Nasib ar-Rifa’I, Muhammad. 2000. Ringkasan Tafsir Ibnu Katsir, IV, terj, Syihabuddin, (Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Rahman Dahlan, Abd, Murtad: Antara Hukuman Mati Dan Kebebasan Beragama: Kajian Hadis dengan Pendekatan Tematik, Jurnal MIQOT Vol. XXXII No. 2 Juli-Desember 2008.

Ridâ. 2006. Akram, al-Riddah wa al-Hurriyyah al-Dîniyyah, t.tp: Dâr al-Wafâ,

Shihab. 2005. Quraish, Tafsir al-Misbah, III, Tangerang: Lentera Hati.

Syahmedi Siregar, Ramadhan, Status Perkawinan Yang Salah Satu Pasangan Murtad: Perspektif UU No. 1 Tahun 1974, KHI dan Fiqh, Jurnal FITRAH Vol. 08 No. 2 Juli-Desember 2014.

Syaltut. 1966. Mahmud, al-Islam ‘Aqidah wa Syari’ah, Mesir: Dar al-Qalam.

Zailia, Siti, Murtad Dalam Prespektif Syafi’i Dan Hanafi, Jurnal Istinbath, No.15, Th. XIV, Juni-2015.

Zuhaili. 2012. Wahbah, Al-fiqh Asy-syafi’i Al-muyassar, Ter. Muhammad Afifi, Abdul Wahid, Fiqih Syafi’i 3, Jakarta: Almahira.

Published
2020-12-30